Post # 26 - Q 1074 [Read between the lines]. We did and this is what we found!
Have you caught Q1074 linking to an article about Joseph Schmitz?
Fake News CNN claims this Trump adviser played a key role in pursuit of possible Clinton emails from dark web before election. Q is asking us to read between the line and when we do, we extract the main information this article is trying to plant in the story line:
[Schmitz] claimed a source he called "PATRIOT," an unidentified contractor he was representing, had discovered what he believed was likely material stolen from Clinton that could contain classified information. Both the client and Schmitz were afraid that going through the material without permission could jeopardize their security clearances, though there is no indication their actions were illegal.
The first important fake news here is the idea that material may have been stolen from Clinton. We already know from Q834, Q701 and this source how and why the private server was set up. We also know who benefited from it and some of the names of government officials who were running the process. The idea of stolen material is a new idea being artificially planted with the purpose of preparing a legal defense strategy and confusing investigators.
The other key here is the last sentence “though there is no indication their actions were illegal.” How does CNN know that? And what actions are they exactly talking about? Is it illegal as an action to discover material you have decided not to go through? Notice the grammar of the sentence. It is not a quote. It is a volatile comment, with no argumentative anchor. This is an indication that CNN wants investigators to focus on the planted information and not the actors. How so? If Joseph Schmitz wakes up one morning and finds some fabricated information at his doorsteps proving H’s classified material was stolen and not distributed, he has to contact federal investigators who then have to interview him and ultimately pursue that theft possibility. This is what CNN means with “no indication their actions were illegal”. You see how it works? They plant fabricated information at the doorstep of a close Trump ally, then, waving the obstruction of justice or preferential treatment flag, they pressure investigators to consider the planted information with front pages like: “Exclusive: Trump adviser played key role in pursuit of possible Clinton emails from dark web before election”. This is what Q means here:
While officials at the State Department and Inspector General briefly interviewed Schmitz, they declined to review or accept the information, according to sources familiar with the process. The FBI interviewed him as a part of its ongoing criminal investigation into Clinton's emails, sources said. It is not clear whether special counsel Robert Mueller is pursuing information about Schmitz's efforts.
This is Mockingbird CNN subtly asking Mueller and Horowitz to take this theft option more seriously so that confusion and protection layers may be successfully added to their investigations. When, instead of reporting the News, media outlets engage in such influence operations to deceitfully create the News, you know their sponsors are in panic mode. In this case, Mueller and Horowitz evidently did not take the bait and downplayed the planted information that Schmitz had to relay to them. Why? Because they already have all they need… From where? From the Military who asked Trump to run and who already gave him the intelligence he is fighting the Deep State with.
Why did Adm R (NSA) meet Trump privately w/o auth?
Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried?
Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors?
Was TRUMP asked to run for President?
What is Mueller's background?
Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering?
How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?
Who is helping POTUS?